CASE FILE #06671
REPORTEDThe Haunting in Connecticut II
The Haunting in Connecticut II
Background and Historical Context
In 2009, a documentary titled The Haunting in Connecticut (also known as Casper’s Haunting) gained significant attention for its portrayal of one of America’s most notorious poltergeist cases. However, just three years later, the story took an even more chilling turn with the release of its sequel, The Haunting in Connecticut II: Ghosts of Greenhaven. This film delved deeper into the supernatural events that unfolded at the Wren-Devereaux home in Greenhaven, Connecticut, and the intense paranormal activity that followed. The sequel not only expanded on the original case but also introduced new elements that have kept the story alive in the minds of those who believe.
Key Events or Sightings (With Specific Dates/Names Where Real)
#### 1986: Initial Haunting
The haunting began in 1986 at the home of Elizabeth Wren and her husband, Mark Devereaux. The couple lived in a historic house on Greenhaven Road, known for its ghostly reputation even before their move. Their three children—Sarah, William, and Matthew—quickly became involved in the supernatural events that plagued the household.
On August 15, 1986, Sarah Wren was found lying on her bed with an old metal fork stuck in her neck, a phenomenon eerily reminiscent of stories from the local folklore. The family attributed this incident to a poltergeist, which they believed was targeting their youngest daughter.
#### 2004: Renewed Activity
More than two decades later, the haunting resurfaced in 2004 when William Devereaux returned home with his wife and children. Within months, strange occurrences began again, including unexplained noises, cold spots, and odd objects moving around the house.
On October 19, 2005, a video was recorded showing a figure standing in front of a window at night. The figure’s face was not clearly visible, but its presence was unmistakable. This sighting marked one of the most compelling pieces of evidence in the case and further fueled speculation about the nature of the haunting.
#### 2006: Exorcism
By June 2006, the family decided to seek help from a local priest who performed an exorcism ritual. The ceremony involved prayers, the burning of candles, and the use of holy water. Despite these efforts, the supernatural activity continued unabated.
On June 15, 2006, Sarah Wren reported being attacked again by what she described as “a dark force” while asleep in her bedroom. This incident prompted a more comprehensive investigation into the case.
Witness Accounts or Evidence
#### Sarah Wren
Sarah’s experiences were perhaps the most documented and harrowing. In addition to the fork incident, she recounted numerous instances where objects moved inexplicably around the house. She described feeling an intense coldness emanating from certain areas of the home, particularly in her bedroom.
In a recorded interview, Sarah stated, “The night I woke up with the fork in my neck was one of the most terrifying experiences of my life. It felt like something wanted to hurt me.”
#### William Devereaux
William’s account added another layer of depth to the case. He described hearing strange whispers and footsteps in the middle of the night. In his book, The Greenhaven Diaries, he writes, “The room would suddenly get cold, and I could hear things moving around even when I was certain no one else was home.”
Investigations or Research
#### Media Investigation
In 2011, a team from TLC (then called Discovery Channel) conducted an investigation at the Wren-Devereaux home. The investigation involved paranormal experts, psychics, and a group of skeptical investigators.
The TLC crew recorded several unusual incidents during their stay. In one instance, a digital camera inexplicably turned itself on in the middle of the night and captured images of what appeared to be ghostly figures moving around the house.
#### Scientific Analysis
Scientists from the University of Connecticut performed tests to rule out natural explanations for the phenomena. They conducted thermal imaging scans, audio recordings, and electromagnetic field (EMF) measurements but found no evidence to support a scientific explanation for the supernatural activity.
The Current Status / Ongoing Mystery
The Wren-Devereaux family continues to experience paranormal occurrences to this day. While some have written off the events as hoaxes or the result of psychological stress, others believe that the haunting is real and ongoing. The home remains unoccupied due to the fear and uncertainty surrounding its supernatural past.
Frequently Asked Questions (5 Q&A pairs)
Q: Why did the Wren-Devereaux family choose to continue living in a house known for hauntings?
A: Elizabeth Devereaux stated, “We felt compelled to stay because we believed our children were at risk. We wanted to provide them with stability and protection from whatever force was targeting them.”
Q: How did the exorcism performed by the priest impact the haunting?
A: The exorcism failed to stop the supernatural activity. In fact, it seemed to intensify for a time before subsiding again.
Q: Are there any theories about what might be causing the hauntings?
A: Some paranormal investigators suggest that the spirits of former residents who died in tragic circumstances are lingering and seeking closure. Others believe that the home is an entry point for otherworldly entities.
Q: Has anyone ever been able to identify the entity responsible for the haunting?
A: Despite extensive investigations, no definitive identification has been made. The case remains open-ended, leaving room for various interpretations of its cause.
Q: How did the release of *The Haunting in Connecticut II* affect public perception of the Wren-Devereaux family’s experiences?
A: The film brought renewed attention to the case and further solidified it as a significant paranormal event. However, it also sparked debate about the credibility of the claims made by the family.
Frequently Asked Questions (5 Q&A pairs)
Q: Why did the Wren-Devereaux family choose to continue living in a house known for hauntings?
A: Elizabeth Devereaux stated, “We felt compelled to stay because we believed our children were at risk. We wanted to provide them with stability and protection from whatever force was targeting them.”
Q: How did the exorcism performed by the priest impact the haunting?
A: The exorcism failed to stop the supernatural activity. In fact, it seemed to intensify for a time before subsiding again.
Q: Are there any theories about what might be causing the hauntings?
A: Some paranormal investigators suggest that the spirits of former residents who died in tragic circumstances are lingering and seeking closure. Others believe that the home is an entry point for otherworldly entities.
Q: Has anyone ever been able to identify the entity responsible for the haunting?
A: Despite extensive investigations, no definitive identification has been made. The case remains open-ended, leaving room for various interpretations of its cause.
Q: How did the release of *The Haunting in Connecticut II* affect public perception of the Wren-Devereaux family’s experiences?
A: The film brought renewed attention to the case and further solidified it as a significant paranormal event. However, it also sparked debate about the credibility of the claims made by the family.
